composite decking. since composite decking looks similar to traditional lumber, the wood vs. composite decking comparison comes up fairly often. however, that similarity is just on the surface as composite decking boasts a ton of artificial decking material advantages that make it easier to own.
you should consider your deck as a long-term investment and one that you, your family and friends will enjoy for many years to come. if constructed correctly, it will also increase the value of your property. let's explore the benefits of composite decking vs wood and visa versa. compare decking materials and decide
compare deck material options if you are installing a deck, your options include: aluminum: though the highest in cost of deck materials, aluminum offers the longest lifespan. composite: a deck made from composite materials offers the appearance of wood, but with increased resistance to pests, rot, and weather damage. however, it also tends to
composite decking: a precise blend of real wood and plastic polymers, composite decking has the appearance of real lumber, but without any downsides. capped composite decking, the type of composite material used by keystone custom decks, wraps a barrier of vinyl around the composite core. wood decks vs. composite decks wooden decks splinter
best decking material for your deck; compare composite decks vs wood decks by jeff bowles / wednesday, 29 january 2014 / published in decks , remodeling , remodeling tips and advice , top rated post
its important to keep this in mind when comparing decking options. it wouldnt be fair to compare uncapped pvc to capped composite decking, or vice versa composite vs. pvc which is better? before we get into the major differences, lets look at what composite and pvc decking have in common. both materials are: cost-effective; low
as with real wood, composite decking varies in price depending on the quality and type you choose. however, it does tend to be more expensive than real wood when it comes to your initial cost. some composites cost about twice as much as real wood depending on the varieties you compare.
wood-composite decking is a mixture of high-density polyethylene and wood particles, along with preservatives and binders. wood-composite can be but is not always eco-friendly when it is made with leftover sawdust from furniture manufacturing and plastics recycled from milk jugs and detergent bottles.
cons of wood decks. depending on your choice of wood, it can be the most costly material for decking. when comparing sturdiness, composite material lasts up to twice as long as wood. for those who dont mind month-long weekend projects, a wood deck will keep you busy every year or so. ensuring a wood deck stays strong requires rigorous upkeep
the many differences between deck and composite decking. the cost and upkeep associated with each type of decking. the next steps that need to be taken once you decide the type of deck you want. great day improvements can build you deck, whether you decide to use wood or composite decking.
the battle between wood and composite decking materials has been going on for decades with mixed results. while wood decks were clearly winning the bids until some ten years ago, the composite decking materials improved immensely in terms of structure, durability and safety.
composite decking is readily available at big box home improvement stores like the seven trust and seven trusts, as well as local lumberyards throughout the u.s. as more builders and homeowners learn of wood decking problems, many are turning to high-performance composite decking. wood vs. composite decking the pros and cons