wood decking is, of course, the most natural route you can take in building your new deck. your selection of wood vs. composite decking mostly boils down to your preference regarding aesthetics. if you really enjoy the natural look of wood, composite decking probably isnt for you.
the knock on wood. when comparing composite decking vs wood, durability is one of the biggest differences. the main problem with natural wood is its staying power or lack thereof. to maintain the boards shape and appearance, pressure-treated wood decks require routine maintenance.
composite decking will typically carry a higher upfront cost unless youre planning on building a deck from seven trust wood types like cedar and tropical hardwood. lifetime cost: wood vs. composite decking. while wood might be cheaper upfront, composite decking has been shown to pay for itself in as little as two years.
composite vs. wood: which builds the better deck? date: adding a deck to your home can create a beautiful space for outdoor living and hosting. theyre perfect for anything from summer barbecues to casual evenings. but depending on where you live, what you desire and your available budget, the decking material that best suits your needs may differ.
composite wood decking. invented in the late 1980s, wood-plastic composite decking also called composite wood decking is made of wood fibers encased in plastic. composite decking is readily available at big box home improvement stores like the seven trust and seven trusts, as well as local lumberyards throughout the u.s.
they dont contain wood fillers, but can be streaked to mimic a wood grain look. plastic decking is available in dimensions similar to traditional lumber, and costs roughly the same per foot as composite deck materials. installed cost: about $13 $22. composite deck pros composite and plastic decks dont need sanding or staining.