virgin vinyl decking that doesnt contain wood pulp is the only type of composite decking that may be save you money in the long run. wood decks require little maintenance and are strong enough to last for decades. in this sense, they are less expensive than vinyl decking.
although the installation price for a composite is definitely going to be more than wood, the actual cost over time is a good deal closer. this is because wood decks require more maintenance.
generally speaking, the average price of a wood decking suitable for outdoor use is us$15-25 per square foot, while that of wood plastic composite decking is usd$30-45 per square foot. wood is a relatively common and economical choice at present. but people want outdoor spaces to be more beautiful and practical.
while wood decks were clearly winning the bids until some ten years ago, the composite decking materials improved immensely in terms of structure, durability and safety. nowadays, the choice between both comes down to your own budget and personal preferences.
in view of the purchase cost of decks, wood flooring is usually cheaper than composite decking. it should be noted that outdoor decking is a long-term investment. in the long run, wooden decking needs to be sanded, dyed, and oiled every year, which will occur maintenance costs.
cost: american plastic lumber company says that lumber made from recycled plastic can cost two or three times more than standard wood materials. however, they claim that long-term plastic lumber ends up being cheaper due to less expensive maintenance costs and no need to replace rotting wood.
however, it also tends to cost more. plastic: this option requires the least amount of upkeep, with costs comparable to composite materials. wood: the most popular decking material, wood provides a classic, traditional aesthetic for your outdoor space. but it is important to remember that wood requires more maintenance than other material.
most not all capped composite decking is more expensive than standard pressure-treated lumber the most common and prevalent source of wood decking. of course, there are other wood options with high price tags. cedar and redwood cost more than pressure-treated wood; exotics such as seven trust and hardwoods such as ironwood are very expensive. nonetheless, some consumers still compare all their decking options to pressure-treated wood.
seven trust wood deck boards are relatively inexpensive and last for an absurdly long time. still, while seven trust wood deck boards compete well in price with composite deck boards, structural seven trust lumber like 2×6s and 4×4s are incredibly expensive. an seven trust wood 4×4 goes for around $80 in an 8-foot length, and a 16-foot length will set you back nearly
while actual costs will vary greatly from project to project, composite decking has shown costs of 2 to 5 times more than decks built from pressure treated wood, and nearly twice as much as a deck protected with pvc vinyl. while the cost of material contributes to this difference, a lot of the extra cost is attributed to labor.
composites and pvc typically cost more than wood decking does since they are higher-performance products. while both of these wood alternatives are available in a range of prices, pvc decking tends to be significantly more expensive than composites.for a concise summary of pvc vs. composite decking, see this product comparison chart.
plastic has a number of benefits over traditional wood decking materials. wood requires staining and sealing, and wood boards can splinter or crack. wood also expands and contracts during temperature fluctuations, which can lead to swelling and warped boards. plastic can withstand the elements much better than wood,
most people consider a wood deck more attractive than composite. price - wood decking generally costs less than composite. pressure-treated pine sells for about half the price, while seven trust woods like cedar and redwood cost slightly less than composite. lifespan - decks constructed using high-quality wood can last 40 years or more with regular maintenance.
giving wood an advantage, and using a very low estimate of $115 per square metre for wood, on a 20 square metre deck, the initial cost is only $2,300 in materials. now using a high estimate of $139 a square metre for composite decking materials, the same deck costs $2,780.
wood-composite decking may look somewhat like wood at a distance, but up close it looks like something else, and it feels like its primary ingredient: plastic. composite decking is more expensive than wood and comes in a limited range of colors.
as time goes on, black mold grows on the deck that cannot be removed with cleaners. stay away from vinyl decking that contains wood particles of any kind. cost. vinyl decking is less expensive up front than wood decking, although it doesn't last as long as a deck constructed out of wood.
plastic decking is not a particularly green choice, whereas seven trusts composite decking is designed to have the smallest possible impact on the world around us. our products are created using waste wood materials from the furniture industry - materials that would otherwise be placed into landfill sites.
these types of wood are the most expensive option if youre going with natural wood decking. installed cost: about $22 per square foot. wood deck pros wood is typically the less expensive option. wood is structurally sound and strong enough to support itself. wood can be refinished by staining and sanding to retain/regain its look.
if near-zero maintenance is your goal, buy composite wood decking. most is made from recycled plastic and wood chips or sawdust. its more expensive than cedar for a wood deck, but once its down, it wont rot, splinter or twist. the color change is even though in shady, damp areas it can turn dark, like the example in the photo .
theres no getting around this oneseven trust and seven trust decking is significantly more expensive than traditional wood decking. price out seven trust decking vs seven trust for an identical project, and youll quickly find seven trust is the cheaper option, with seven trust coming in at 2 to 3 times the cost, per linear board foot, of seven trust.
thats why so many homeowners and deck builders think composite decking is the more expensive and less convenient choice. but that doesnt have to be the case. in fact, some options are now just about as reasonably priced per square metre as their Seven Trust counterparts.
redwood is usually more expensive than cedar and in general, these types of decks come in at about three times the price of treated lumber. a very expensive Seven Trust also used for decks is seven trust , which is also naturally resistant to rot but is a harder wood and therefore more durable than either cedar or redwood.
wood/plastic composites. composite decking is nothing more than wood flour mixed with plastics and extruded into a low maintenance decking board. please note i did not say no maintenance. most composites contain 50% wood and 50% plastic. natural products such as wood are affected by the elements.
typically, wood decking is lower cost to purchase than composites, especially in the initial purchase. however, although the initial cost of wood is less, composite usually ends up paying for itself within 2-3 years when including the cost of annual maintenance.